Why I Left Nike+

For those who haven’t seen it, I did a review of the Nike+ FuelBand when it first came out.  Don’t read it.  I’ll save you the trouble.  That’s not to say the review wasn’t good, but it’s not relevant anymore.  I’ve decided to move on from the FuelBand and Nike+ (not quite 100%), and it seems like Nike has sort of decided the same thing.

For background, the FuelBand was a sought-after piece of wearable fitness tech.  It tracked your daily activity in units called NikeFuel that weren’t as direct as steps or calories (though it could track those, too) like other fitness trackers (FitBit, Jawbone Up, etc).  It was on the more expensive side, but had a great, fun app and large ecosystem since Nike+ had been around for years and was a thriving community of runners (mostly).  Nike+ devices were all over the place since many iPods, iPhones and Nike shoes were ready to track activity right out of the box (or with a $20 footpod inserted into them).  Nike partnered with TomTom on a GPS watch, too.  Basically, you had an existing community to add NikeFuel and the FuelBand to, unlike competitors who were starting from scratch.  That was attractive.

Nike+ website at 6:20am on 10/25/14

Fast forward two years, and Nike had iterated the FuelBand once (with the SE), yet didn’t add anything revolutionary to the mix (ok, much better battery life, BTLE, activity session tracking – which is both good and bad), and had basically stopped developing the Nike+ platform.  In fact, a key part of the FuelBand at launch was the little motivational mascot named Fuelie who you would unlock videos of based on how active you were.  He was hokey yet fun at the same time.  Fuelie videos disappeared from the app and site, and you basically started getting these weird badges and awards for odd things (you were active twice today), and often a different badge was awarded for the same thing (or seemingly the same – it was more confusing than it needed to be).  The site also became increasingly slow and unresponsive, or wouldn't load at all (see what it looked like the morning I posted this blog entry).  The performance issue seemed to be mixed for various users, and seemed to be tied to those with higher NikeFuel scores (I am at about 5.2 million right now).

The sessions functionality was perhaps the most maddening since you need to tell the FuelBand that you are working out.  Well, you don’tneed to, but you should so you can get more credit for your activity.  See, I am very active and typically earned 8-9k a day with my first gen FuelBand.  When I switched to the SE, I’d struggle to get to 3,500.  When I did 30-45 minutes of high intensity intervals on the elliptical, gen 1 would give me 1500 (or so) NikeFuel and the SE would give me 200-300.  They changed the algorithm supposedly to be more accurate (I brought this up to Nike and they kept telling me I was wrong and this was more accurate).  No way.  A 10 minute run was worth the same as 45 minutes on the elliptical?  Not possible.  And, yes, I use my arms on the elliptical.  They said I should use the Session feature since some activities get higher NikeFuel scores.  Great.  Well, only three activities do – running, swimming and cycling (I might be wrong on swimming).  Running is only slightly higher.  Cycling lets you assign an intensity rating that then dictates how much NikeFuel you get.  The problem there is in the descriptions.  Low intensity sounds like you basically are coasting, doing nothing.  Medium says you barely break a sweat, if at all.  High is hard work.  Well, I don’t do low or medium often since I generally sweat and make myself pant now and then, so everything is high for me.  But that high score seems too high relative to – again – what I do on the elliptical or running.  30 minutes of high cycling effort is over 1,000 NikeFuel, versus 600-800 for running and 200-300 for the elliptical.  No way.

And that would be lovely if I could actually set the parameters of each session, but I couldn’t do that online since the Nike+ portal would never load the session for me to edit.  I would have to sync the device, and then go to my iPhone and edit the session (I couldn’t do it all on my iPhone since I was testing iOS 8, and there was a Bluetooth issue that Nike had to fix, so you couldn’t sync the device via an iPhone – they’ve since fixed it).

Then the biggest let down, and the straw that broke the camel’s back for me came when I was doing the Canary Challenge.  103 miles of cycling with some very intense efforts.  I set a session to start as I left the start of the ride.  I shut the session down when I came through the finish several hours later.  I synced my device expecting to get like 20-30k NikeFuel.  I went to edit the intensity, but was told that you can’t edit intensity for sessions over 6 hours.  What?  Why?  Who decided that and for what purpose?  Net result – I got 11,311 NikeFuel for the entire day, with about 10,000 for the ride

.  Looking at my Strava account, I burned 5,262 calories on the ride.  Do you think I really only did 10k NikeFuel over 7ish hours?

So, I was left with something that wasn’t accurately capturing my efforts and took a lot of effort to deal with.  I realize these aren’t major life problems, but the issue is that this is meant to be a motivational tool.  Not only was it not motivating me anymore because of what was taken out of the system (both the reward of points and of videos and encouragement that made sense), but the effort you had to put into dealing with it was too high and getting higher, which was demotivating.  I had to retire my FuelBand (and actually sold it).  I wish it had worked out differently as I liked a lot of things about it (built in USB plus is BRILLIANT).  I made a switch, and am rocking a Garmin vivosmart, and really liking it.  It actually tells me to move if it senses that I’ve been inactive for certain amounts of time, and it seems to be fairly accurately tracking my steps regardless of what activity I do (not to mention it’s quasi-smart-watch feature set).  More on that in another post, but I wanted to update you on the FuelBand since I gave it such a glowing review early on.  With our health, we have to keep moving ahead and not lose focus or drive.  I feel Nike did that with the FuelBand, so I can’t recommend it as a tool to help you enlighten.your.body.

So Long, 35

A selfie on my final 35 year old morning

As I sit here on the last night that I'm 35, I thought it would be appropriate and a bit nice to reflect on the past year of my life.  It was a year filled with lots of trials (mentally and physically), tremendous growth, and was overall a great year.  Some people look back on a year of their life and are thankful it's over.  Some wish it wouldn't end and are sad to see it go.  I can't feel either way about 35, not because it didn't have reasons to make me feel either way, but because feelings like that don't set me up for positivity and success.  No, I'm leaving 35 feeling invigorated, glad to have lived this particular year, and excited for how it's prepared me for the years still to come.

This year saw the toughest year of my professional career, with politics at work getting the best of me, and my having to make a tough call to leave a job I truly loved and saw myself in for the long haul.  As they say, the toughest decisions are often the best.  Sure enough, I am in a new role with a new company that I'm extremely excited about, with lots of opportunity in front of me, and the power to make things happen.  I miss my old job and colleagues, but also know what I missed wasn't what it was anymore, and am feeling blessed to be where I am now.

My first (but not last) half marathon

I took on a physical challenge I never expected to do with a half marathon the week after my 35th birthday.  I never used to run, and even when I picked it up, I didn't expect to do more than 5K or 10K races.  In fact, the 10K I did a few months before turning 35 was so tough and unenjoyable, I figured I wouldn't do anything but 5Ks again if I even raced at all.  Not only did a I do a half, but I beat the goal time I had set for myself, and would have definitely beat my dream time if I didn't have a damaged tendon and broken bone in my left foot.  I have another one two weeks from my 36th birthday, and am feeling much better about my preparedness and injury status.

Speaking of injuries, while I did spend many months dealing with the injuries I mentioned above (I didn't really run consistently after the half for eight months, and was in an air cast for a while), this year marked the first in a while where I didn't have or wasn't recovering from surgery.  I've had some operation or recovered from one basically without interruption since 2008.  Two knee surgeries, back surgery and double hernia surgery over four and a half years, with a bout of swine flu thrown in the mix for good measure.  While I certainly had some injuries to recover from, my body did what it was made to do and healed and grew stronger.  My mind did, as well, as I learned a lot about smart training, evening out inequities in the body, and taking time when you need it.  I also learned about how much capacity I have to do things and do more of them - even when my mind tells me otherwise (the half had a lot to do with that learning).

My second, toughest century ride

I took on another century ride, and it was intense and challenging.  But I did it.  I don't get to train with real climbs, and this ride had a few very real, very long, very steep ones, but I powered through and passed those ahead of me.  My left knee was a bit of a victim, but I know what to do to get it back on track, and it's progressing nicely (and oddly isn't a problem when I run at all, so my next half is still safe).

With newbodi.es, I had a great year.  I got to do some really valuable continuing education. I coached an awesome young lady to a fantastic weight loss, but more importantly a new 'whole health' life that will absolutely endure.  I got to meet Dean Karnazes.  I became a FitFluential ambassador.  I also launched my video podcast and YouTube channel, and recorded 31 episodes, including doing a couple of great interviews of people I respect a ton (thanks again to Dai Manuel and Alex Hutchison for joining me).

On the home front, my family continued to deal with my wife's illness, yet also benefit from the learnings and health consciousness we've gained as a result.  Despite the hardships of it, we're also better off in terms of the food and healthcare choices we make.  I know I would be hard pressed to be as fit as I am if the woman across the table from me was eating junk, so my health is clearly benefitting from what my wife is doing to manage hers.

We also saw our son start elementary school, which was exciting and sad at the same time.  He's amazing, and loves school so much.  As a parent, it's hard not to be filled with joy and pride to see him so happy and thriving.

So, I'm not writing off 35.  I'm not lamenting or mourning its passing.  I'm thankful for the year I've had.  I'm excited for the years I will have.  I owe both of those feelings to what I lived while being 35 and how I grew while being 35.  My wife said it brilliantly when I told her about this post.  She said, "I see any year as a gift, and they all taught me things."  So true.  Be whatever age you are, be grateful for how you lived it and for what will come after it, and enlighten.your.body.

Review: Mizuno Wave Rider 18

the buildup

So for those who don’t know, I’m a huge Mizuno fan.  I never really thought about their shoes before becoming a runner, doing the typical American thing of paying attention to Nike, Adidas, Reebok and maybe New Balance.  Mizuno isn’t a big advertiser in the US, and I wasn’t into being other than sedentary for a good chunk of my life.  They’re actually pretty active in their specialist niches of baseball and golf, but still not hugely so in running (though they have some great grass roots campaigns like the Mezamashii Project and the “What If Everybody Ran” campaign where you run with their “baton” app and your miles translate into donations from Mizuno - 87,000 miles were run for charity in total this year!).

So if I wasn’t into or even really much aware of their products, how did I become a huge fan?  I follow the blog Runblogger (an absolute must-read for anyone even remotely interested in running), and I found that Pete, the owner/main writer, and I have very similar tastes in shoes.  He was a fan of the Adidas adiPure Gazelle, which I picked up based on his review, and was totally smitten.  So when he later reviewed a pair of Mizunos with similar kinds of things coming across in his description, I felt I needed to give them a try (my Adidas were wearing out much faster than I expected – the uppers were too loose at 40 miles of use, which is not cool at all), so I was keen to switch to something else).  That shoe was the Mizuno Wave Evo Cursoris (just rolls off the tongue), which I picked up from Running Warehouse (great online retailer, by the way), and was really blown away.  Definitely read my review of the shoe – it’s one I continue to love on every run.  My one issue with it is that Mizuno discontinued the entire Evo line (their minimalist-style shoes).  They did a version 2.0 of two of the three Evo models, but never released it in the US, so I’ve been buying up whatever clearance stock I can find in my size of the 1.0 and 2.0 (found a European retailer that ships free to the US) in my size.  I prefer the 2.0 given some changes they made to the upper, but I literally can’t find it in my size at all anymore (I was able to get 2 pairs).

That’s enough background on why I love Mizuno, but I do.  So how did I end up reviewing this very traditional-looking shoe if I’m a minimalist kinda guy?  I’m a FitFluential ambassador, and was lucky enough to be chosen to receive a pair from Mizuno to review.  So here we are.  I’ve run in this shoe both inside on the treadmill and outside.  You can actually watch my treadmill run since I recorded an episode of my podcast doing a live review of the shoe.  I thought it would be a fun way to get my real first impressions of it as I was being firstly impressed upon by it.

Full disclosure: this pair of shoes was provided free of charge by Mizuno for the purpose of this review.  The views and opinions are my own.  And, as always, I’m never going to recommend something I don’t like or believe in, so know that what you’re reading is very real.

my impressions

The shoe is very nice.  It’s light(ish), very well constructed (seriously, I can’t imagine this thing biting the dust before 450 miles or more), stylish without being weird, and packed with useful technology.  The weight is just 9.2 ounces for a men’s size 9 (I sampled the 9.5, which is my typical size for Mizuno, but I generally wear a 10 in other brands).  In my video comparison, I talk a lot about the Saucony Kinvara.  I realized this isn’t a good comparison point (the Mizuno Wave Sayonara is probably more aimed at the Kinvara).  The Saucony Fastwitch is probably more accurate to compare the Wave Rider against.  In either case, the Saucony is lighter (the Kinvara is 1.5 ounces lighter – I’m not sure about the Fastwitch).  Saucony has done some pretty amazing things with the laws of physics to get their shoes sort of oddly light.  Mizuno did well enough, but Saucony definitely beats them on weight.  Still, I wouldn’t say I found the Wave Rider 18 to be heavy.  I’m about 6’2” and 180, so perhaps if I was a more, um, lithe man, I’d notice the weight more, but I don’t think that they’d ever be a problem.

Mizuno talks about Hado, a Japanese word that sums up their approach to the shoe.  It's about the vibrational life energy behind transformations.  What?  No, seriously, if you stop and think about it, this makes a lot of sense.  The technology and design approach all work together to give you a light shoe that transfers energy beautifully to move you through your run.  And running is transformative for your mind, body and soul.  Literally.  Seriously.  So the idea behind the design approach makes a lot of sense and it really shows in the shoe.  That said, I find that this shows in every Mizuno shoe, so this is really a case of the Rider not being an exception more than being some new breakthrough where Mizuno is hitting its stride (no pun intended).

As for the tech, the first thing I’d mention is the Wave plate.  But I’ll mention that second because we’re talking about weight.  A key tool Mizuno has been using to drive weight down is their U4ic (get it, “euphoric”?  Yes, I did look at it about a year ago, and say, “Huh?  You for eye see?”  I’m quick, apparently.)  U4ic is a foam Mizuno developed that’s thinner than traditional EVA, yet has similar (or better) absorption and energy return properties.  It replaced the AP+ foam they were using, and cuts 30% of the weight out versus AP+. The result is better cushion per ounce, allowing for the same cushion and spring with less weight.  Several brands have similar foam technologies employed.  They all have applied some marketing name to them.  I have U4ic on all Mizunos I run or have run in, and find it to be a really nice foam.

As for the Wave plate, that’s Mizuno’s thing, like Air is Nike’s (or Lunarlon, too).  It’s a plate that runs from the heel, then has two arms extending the mid-foot area (a Double Fan Wave, in Mizuno-speak - see the grayish area coming from the back through the middle of the shoe).  There's also a forefoot Wave plate.  The purpose is to provide a springy pop and transfer energy effectively through the shoe to aid your stride.  The version in the Evo line is in the mid-to-forefoot area of the shoe since they’re meant for toe striking, with no Wave plate in the heel.  I have found the Wave plate to do what it’s meant to do, and do think it’s a useful piece of technology.  I can’t say for certain since I have no way to run in the same shoe with and without the plate, but energy transfer on Mizunos has always felt great to me.  I describe my Cursoris as disappearing as I run faster – it’s like they come alive as you move quicker.  I think the Wave plate has a lot to do with that.  Here, it’s present in the heel, and visible when you look at the bottom of the shoe.  I felt a good energy transfer and a lively movement with the Wave Rider (and I did in the Wave Sayonara, which also has it in the heel).

The shoe also features Dynamotion Fit, which is Mizuno’s approach to shaping the shoe so that it stays with you through the entire stride, including striking and lift off.  It's more than just shaping, but also building the shoe to deal with the stress of striking so that it doesn't deform, and thus stays with you through the stride.  I don’t know what they’re doing specifically here, but I do know that I’ve never had an issue with Mizunos shifting around, slipping, etc.  I definitely have experienced that with other shoe brands.  So, whatever they do to make Dynamotion Fit a thing, it's working very well across their line, and the Wave Rider 18 is no exception.  Also, there’s no heel counter on this shoe, nor does it need one.  The heel is really nicely designed and shaped, and was super comfortable.  At least for me.  Overall, the shoe fits really well and that fit was maintained throughout the strike, meaning less chance of blisters or hot spots.

The upper features a good, breathable mesh.  I found my toes to be really comfortable in them, as in other Mizunos.  The mesh isn’t as open as in the Evo line (you can see your socks inside in Evos).  One major ding I gave the Gazelles and other adiPure shoes is how hot they get due to being closed lycra (or lycra-like) material.  Not an issue here.  My feet were nice and comfortable all around.  This is a bigger deal than you may think – hot feet are more likely to develop blisters and aches due to the sweating.

The last thing I’d mention is that the Wave Rider 18 was very forefootstrikable.  Yes, that’s a word.  OK, no it isn’t.  But I mean I could very easily toe strike in them.  That can be tough for a shoe shaped like this with such a big heel-toe-drop (12mm is what they’re reported to have, but it seems far less than that in person or when running).  For comparison sake, I had trouble toe striking in the Kinvara 4, and that is softer and has a much lower drop.  I had no trouble in the Wave Sayonara, either, so I’m thinking kudos are in order to Mizuno for building a traditional shoe that can accommodate different running styles so well.

So, essentially, you have a very nice shoe that fits well, has a good neutral approach (not over-built, not minimalist) that should do well for many runners, and is packed with features that really seem to benefit the performance while not adding a lot of weight.  Good stuff.

my depressions

The one thing that stuck with me through both the indoor and outside runs was how firm the shoe felt.  Now my comparison point may be a bit unfair since I generally run in minimalist shoes.  And by, “generally,” I mean, “exclusively unless I’m reviewing something.”  And my favorite shoes (anything in the Evo line) are so compliant that most traditional looking shoes are too firm to me.  The one exception I can think of is the Saucony Kinvara, but that’s known for being a pretty mushy shoe (that’s usually the main thing people don’t like about it).  If you like a firm shoe, then you probably would have no issue with the Wave Rider.  I don’t, so it bothered me a bit.  I ran fine, but it just didn’t feel as natural to me as I wanted it to.  My Achilles tendons also hurt quite a bit within about an hour of running in the Wave Rider.  Don’t read too much into that – this is because the shoe is a departure from what I put most of my miles in, so my body needed to adjust to it.  I didn’t do that, so I ended up with some pain I probably could have avoided by slowly adding distance starting with a casual mile.  I didn’t run a ton in them (2.2 and 2.6 miles), but I ran them fairly fast for me (especially the 2.6, but I finished the 2.2 at 10 mph or a 6’ pace versus my typical 8’ish pace).

Why do I think they’re so firm?  Well, I mentioned the Wave plate above.  It’s possible that the Wave plate being in the back is meant to aide heel strikers, and for a forefoot striker, it’s creating higher levels of firmness in the shoe.  It’s possible I’m wrong, too – I’m speculating here.  The other reason I would guess is part of why the shoe is going to last so long.  It has full rubber coverage of the strike area, and that rubber has good thickness to it (part of why it’s heavier than the Kinvara, which has a lot of EVA+ on the sole to save weight). Rubber is stiffer than foam (I know, shocking, right?), so the shoe is naturally going to be firmer.  Mizuno solved for this with the sole of the Sayonara a bit by designing the rubber application differently.  But the Rider's rubber is definitely creating a stiffer shoe than if it was thinner or less pervasive.  I’m not knocking it, just noting it.  It’s a choice – what do you want in a shoe?

to buy or not to buy

So what do I think in terms of recommending this shoe?  I was very impressed by it.  I think it’s a great shoe, for sure.  I would recommend it in a heartbeat.  But not for everyone.  I would want to know what you prefer in your shoes in terms of firmness.  I have a friend who tries to get the firmest shoe she can find.  She would probably love these.  I have a friend (ok, me), who doesn’t really take to firm shoes so well, so I would not buy them myself.  If you want a firmer shoe that will wear really real, be very comfortable, breathable and light enough, it’s pretty hard not to recommend the Mizuno Wave Rider 18. If that's what you want, then they can be a key tool to help you enlighten.your.body.

Podcast Episode 031 - review: Mizuno Wave Rider 18

See a live running review of the new Mizuno Wave Rider 18. We take you and the new Mizuno Wave Rider 18 on a run to review the shoe in real time. Lots of sweat and lots of live insight on this great shoe to help you enlighten.your.body.

Full disclosure - these shoes were all provided to me by Mizuno USA for the purpose of this review.  All thoughts contained are my own, though.

Watch this blog to read a full review, including thoughts after an outdoor run with the Mizuno Wave Rider 18.

If you enjoyed this video, subscribe on YouTube or get the podcast on iTunes and spread the word. It's one more tool I'm giving you to help you enlighten.your.body.

Race & Place or Ride with Pride?

I just got back from a truly epic charity event out in San Francisco.  It's called the Canary Challenge, and the purpose is to raise money for the Canary Foundation at Stanford.  The Foundation is trying to develop a blood test for early detection of cancer.  The idea being that early detection means less extreme intervention and higher cure rates.  If you are familiar with the phrase 'canary in a coal mine', that's where their name came from.

Anyway, back to the subject of this post.  I do both races and charity events.  Some charity events are races (Susan G. Koman Race for the Cure, for example).  Most are not.  Charity cycling events are often called 'rides', while the Canary Challenge is called, well, a 'challenge'.  That's definitely due to the grueling nature of the course, which ascends 8,455 feet over 103 miles, including two climbs that last longer than 30 minutes (the second comes at mile 78, so you're just a bit tired at that point!), plus another in between them that's nearly as long (only you also have headwinds and it was raining a bit).

Anyway number 2, back to the subject of the post again.  So what am I talking about today?  I believe in the value of racing.  I also believe in the value of not racing.  What's that?  Hipocracy, you say?

Well, let's take the racing part first.  I have found that I am not pushing myself as much as I can when I run.  It's not to say I'm not tired at the end of a run, but my pacing is never what it is in a race.  When I did my first half marathon, I was injured, and my training runs were in the upper half of the 8-9 minute per mile range.  When I did the race, I was at 7'50" until mile 10 when the really steep hills hit, and I finished with an average of just over 8'.  My injuries were hurting a lot, but I was fine energy-wise and endurance-wise.  If I wasn't in pain, I would have easily been able to keep going for a while.  So, for me, getting into a race is a fantastic way to push yourself and learn more about your limits.  Was I going for a top 3 finish?  Was I trying to pass everyone?  No.  I was racing for my own goals and treated it as a personal event.  But I was being egged on by the 1,000 other runners around me, and definitely had little bouts of being more competitive and passing people when I felt the power to pick someone off. It feels great.  I also learned that I'm really good at running up hills relative to most other runners.  I never would have known that without doing this race.

I got a lot out of that race, and others I've done, mainly around what I'm actually capable of.  Setting successive PRs in 5Ks each time I do one feels great, and they're all times I never imagined whether as an overweight kid/teen, or as a fit 30-something father and husband.  Physically and competitively, it feels great.

But as great as racing is, I also see value in events that aren't races.  The Canary Challenge has a kinship across riders that made it amazing.  I was exhausted by it, and my left knee is still in bad shape from the long climbs (funny since my right knee was the problem going in, but that's been fine).  But I didn't care.  I loved it.  Really loved it.  I rode with some friends, though we weren't together too much. The time we rode together was great, and I made a point to meet up with them and visit for a bit at the aid stations, which brought an even tighter feel of community.  I started recognizing jerseys, and chatted some of the familiar ones up as we were grinding up the mountain together, or when stopped at an aid station.

Where did I place?  I have no idea - no one was tracking it.  How many riders were in my age group?  I dunno - a bunch, maybe?  Maybe not?  What was my final time and average speed?  I know both of those, but they don't matter.  What I got out of it was a grueling event that definitely worked my body, but also worked my mind and soul.

So, my point is hopefully clearer and less hypocritical-sounding.  Racing can be incredibly good for your development in whatever sport you do.  So can events that aren't races.  Do them both.  Don't lose sight of the value of either, and enlighten.your.body.

To Apple Watch or Not To Apple Watch

Apple Watch Sport Collection
Photo Courtesy of Apple

Before I get into this, I need to disclose that I am a huge Apple fan.  Not quite a fan boy, but not not a fan boy. And for those posts where people say I was compensated to share this or the product was provided for free - that's not the case here. It's kind of the way around.  Apple was compensated by me. Several times over. A lot. And then some more. Yeah, I have lots of Apple stuff. And I like it.

OK, that said, I'm torn about the Apple Watch. It's very cool and all that. No doubt. It does some really neat things. For sure. It's gorgeously designed. As with all Apple gear. Will I buy it? Not so sure.

I expected to see the thing and be like, "When can I preorder?" But I didn't feel that way.  I may still get one, but I'm not rushing into it, and wouldn't get it because of a clear need or use case (kind of how I felt about the iPad).  The reason for me is that the fitness tracking part of it doesn't really work for my needs.

Nike FuelBand SE

I have a Nike+ FuelBand (that I'm planning to stop wearing at the end of the month since I don't find it impacting my behavior anymore, and can't stand Nike's website given the molasses-based speed and constant issues/downtime). It tracks steps, calories, general activity, and provides awards and motivation, just like Apple intends to do with the Apple Watch. Nike has really stepped back from how involved and invested they were in the Nike+ ecosystem, with less investment in the ramification side. You used to get these little videos with a character called Fuelie, but they stopped doing that. Now they have all these random trophies that I don't fully understand the point of and seem to win far too easily (I win more than 1 a day, and don't know the difference between them, nor do I care). Their site is also painfully slow, down far too often for maintenance (that doesn't seem to be for any benefit in functionality), and parts of it just don't work (you have to tell the SE version of the FuelBand when you're in some sort of workout session and then go tag that session with the proper activity on their site, only the tagging page stopped loading about two weeks ago, and still isn't working. I can tag things from the iOS app, but it means syncing via USB (Bluetooth syncing stopped working on my FuelBand for some reason), and then going to the phone to tag).  I would rather an activity tracker be smart enough to know that I'm being active, and not need me to tell it as much.  Apple seems to have done this better as they claim the Watch knows if you're biking versus running.  But this will be something to watch for and judge after its released since it's all a bit unclear and untested now.

Garmin Forerunner 620

I have a fantastic running watch (Garmin Forerunner 620). I don't usually run with my phone, or at least I prefer not to. I won't hold it due to the impact on gait, and don't want to bring a bag or pouch just for my phone. I find arm bands uncomfortable, and I sweat a lot, so my phone invariably ends up wet - that can't be good for it in the long term.  But I need that GPS tracking that the Apple Watch can't do without a phone.  I'm a total data junky, and want everything recorded.  Without my phone, the Apple Watch can't track my run beyond simple step measurement.  I need pacing, and it can't really give me that.  I also get some awesome advanced metrics from my Garmin as I pair it with their FirstBeat-enabled heart strap, so I get cadence, ground contact time, vertical oscillation, training effect and VO2 Max data.  The Apple Watch can't do any of that (with or without a phone), and I have come to appreciate it.

There's talk about why Apple didn't put GPS in the Watch. It's likely due to price and package size for something that isn't a common need (even if you cycle or run daily outdoors  as I usually do but the majority of people likely don't (or do it in a gym on some machine), you still don't need it a lot of the time of the day). And GPS does drain batteries, but running watches don't keep it on unless you're in a run. And then you can just charge it when you get home - that's what I do, and I don't get mad at the watch or decry its battery life since I knowingly did something that is a power hog.

I think size, cost and battery considerations are part of the story, but I think it's also about making the phone more valuable to watch buyers and vice versa. Remember, the Apple Watch only works with the iPhone (and only models since the 5). Smart business decision, despite any annoyance it may cause. I'm just saying that including a GPS receiver in the Watch could actually fuel more sales for people like me.

So, would I buy a smart watch to take it off and wear a different smart watch for runs? That's the question. For me, I don't think I can answer that until the device is out, more of the features are known, and I think about what is missing that I'd really want before buying it. That's what happened with the iPad - I knew I needed a front facing camera to do video chats with my wife and son when I travelled for work, or it wouldn't be valuable enough for me to buy.  So I waited until they added that feature, and bought an iPad 2. For me, it could be a question of waiting for the Apple Watch 2. Or maybe the 2S. Or 2C.  Or 2 Plus. Or whatever. We'll just have to see.

But You Don't Have The Body of A...

I hear comments like this all the time, whether from someone about themself or about others.  "Oh, but I'm not built like a runner."  "You don't have a cyclist body."  "I'm too skinny to lift weights."

The thing is, if you do it, you are it.  You have the body for it.  For example, I have a bigger build than the stereotypical runner.  But I'm a runner (notice I didn't just say, "I run," but actually said, "I'm a runner.").  And I have a build.  Hence, I have the build of a runner.

Same for cycling.  I don't look like top cyclists.  Yet, I have a body, and I'm a cyclist.  A+B=C.

This isn't to say if you do X and have a body, then you have the typical/ideal/professional body type for it.  But does that need to matter?  I'm not trying to be a world class runner.  I'm just running because it's amazing - for my body, for my mind, for the example I set for my son, etc.  Do I need to have a body like Usain Bolt or Steve Prefontaine?  Does not having their body mean I'm not a runner, can't run, or shouldn't run?  Somehow, I ran to work this morning, doing 7.5 miles, and didn't burst into flames or anything.

I am big for a cyclist.  Not huge, but big.  I'm more muscular in my upper body, carry more mass in my legs, and generally weigh about 40-50 pounds more than the elites.  Yet somehow I did 50 miles the other day at just a hair under 20 mph.  Is that elite speed?  Naw.  Is it good?  Did I feel great?  Heck yeah.  Did I burst into flames then?  Nope.

Granted, the amount of sweating I'm doing may be helping to keep me from spontaneously combusting despite lacking the archetypical body for these activities, but I think it's more than the comments people make and the sentiments underlying them are what's flawed.  Not my body (or yours, or that guy running down the street).

So, don't look at yourself in the mirror and presume you can't ___ (fill in the blank).  Look yourself in the eye, and realize that you absolutely can. Go on. Get out there, create your potential, and enlighten.your.body.